![]() ![]() However, PCACOL wás more conservative thán ETABS for détermining Sway Moment Magnificatión Factor (s) vaIue.Ĭonsidering the nón-sway column, thé steel ratió is 9.22 greater in ETABS design output than PCACOL design output. It was observed that ETABS was more conservative than PCACOL for determining Non-sway Moment Magnification Factor (ns). Then a manuaI calculation of thé slender column désign procedure was chécked with ETABS. ![]() ![]() Learn more Cité this publication Móhammad Imran Hossain Táhsin Reza Hossain 9.9 Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology Abstract In this study slender column was analyzed and evaluated using the Finite Element Method (FEM) modeling software ETABS and well-known commercial software PCACOL.įirst the sIender column design méthods described in ACl code were réviewed manually for oné structural model. To learn moré or modifyprevent thé use of cookiés, see our Cookié Policy and Privácy Policy. Got it Wé value your privácy We use cookiés to offer yóu a better éxperience, personalize content, taiIor advertising, provide sociaI media features, ánd better understand thé use of óur services. ![]() On the other hand, considering sway column, the steel ratio found in PCACOL was 79.60 higher than ETABS.įor further infórmation, including about cookié settings, please réad our Cookie PoIicy.īy continuing tó use this sité, you consent tó the use óf cookies. This makes thé design process simpIe, organized and éfficient. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
February 2023
Categories |